Obama Commission Recommends End To Subsidized Student Education Loans

Pin It

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform has issued a written report that recommends the elimination of subsidized federal student education loans so that you can reduce federal spending.

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform has issued a study that recommends the elimination of subsidized federal student loans in order to reduce federal spending. The recommendation is one of 50 that the bipartisan panel, that was created by President Obama and charged with finding approaches to reduce the federal deficit, brought forward.

Federal subsidized figuratively speaking are government-issued figuratively speaking where the us government pays –subsidizes — the interest while a student is in school or within an approved deferment period. During deferment periods, which are granted on a case-by-case basis when a student loan borrower is experiencing financial hardship or other extenuating circumstances, the borrower isn’t needed to make principal or interest payments on his / her federal college loans.

Subsidized student education loans, awarded based on financial need, can be found to low-income students and students from low-income families. The President’s fiscal commission estimates that eliminating the federal interest payments on these subsidized college loans would save about $5 billion annually.

The proposal to eliminate subsidized federal figuratively speaking isn’t a recommendation to shutter the federal education loan program altogether. Federally funded student education loans may also be obtainable in an unsubsidized form, and these unsubsidized figuratively speaking are awarded to eligible students, regardless of income bracket, who be eligible for a federal college grants for single mothers to help them buy college.

Do Student loan Subsidies Benefit Students?

A growing number of policy groups support dispensing with federally subsidized student education loans. The college Board recommended the same move around in 2008, plus some Democratic lawmakers also included the elimination of subsidized figuratively speaking in the initial draft of the student loan reforms which were enacted in ’09. The provision was dropped after student advocates and higher education lobbyists successfully persuaded House Democrats to retain the student loan subsidies.

Supporters of dropping the subsidized interest benefit say that subsidized student education loans don’t do anything to produce college more accessible to the low-income students to whom the loans are awarded, since borrowers don’t reap the advantage of the subsidy until after they’ve graduated.

Others who support the move to eliminate subsidized student loans argue that student borrowers shouldn’t get a benefit designed to reduce education loan debt that’s based on what the borrower’s family income was 10 or twenty years earlier.

Instead, proponents contend, already-available flexible student loan repayment plans like income-dependent payments, graduated payments, and repayment term extensions tend to be more effective and fairer.

A new income-based repayment plan, instituted last year, is founded on the student loan borrower’s post-graduation income, a better way of measuring a borrower’s long-term financial outlook.

Graduated repayment, when a student loan borrower’s monthly obligations start off low and gradually increase every 2 yrs — created for borrowers who are expecting their income to increase steadily with time — can be acquired to all borrowers of federal college loans, irrespective of their family income during the time they attended college.

More Proposed Changes to Federal College grants for single mothersiminating federal student loan interest subsidies isn’t the only real change the fiscal commission recommends. The commission’s deficit-reduction proposal would also stop payments to colleges and universities for the administration of campus-based federal grants for single mothers programs.

Universities and colleges administer certain federal grants for single mothers awards locally –Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants, Perkins loans, and federally funded work-study programs. A school may retain as much as {5} percent of the federal grants for single mothers funds provided for these programs to cover the expense of administration. Institutions that distribute federal Pell Grants also receive a small fixed payment to cover administrative costs.

Underneath the proposed deficit-reduction plan, the 5-percent administrative fee will be eliminated, and all federal funds would be delivered in the form of student grants for single mothers, without any portion of those funds being siphoned away any longer in the form of administrative costs.

The commission’s rationale for eliminating these administrative fees is that universities and colleges reap the benefits of federal grant programs because, unlike college loans, the federal grant dollars effectively increase enrollment by making college less expensive for students.

From Policy Proposal to National Law

The fiscal commission doesn’t always have the last say on which recommended reforms are enacted. Currently, the commission’s report is in draft form. The commission must prepare a final recommendation no later than Dec. 1, 2010, and the final draft must have the approval of at least 14 of the commission’s 18 members.

When the report is finalized and presented to the White House, legislators are expected to take up the recommendations and convert them into legislative mandates.

The commission’s recommendations are made to balance the federal budget by 2015. If adopted, the recommendations would involve an easy group of austerity measures, including both spending cuts and tax reforms.

figuratively speaking, income-based student loan repayment, campus-based grants for single mothers

Leave a Reply

*